Portal de Aguilas
www.portaldeaguilas.com
The court rejected the arguments put forward by real estate companies "Hispania Investment Group, Inc.", "Inverlur Eagles I and II, SLU" about the absence of environmental values in the area, justifying a report by the Global Nature Fund.
The Supreme Court considered precisely that "... with the possible condition to such securities, and therefore the public interest implicit in them, can not override the particular interests of the commercial co-defendants in running the General Plan amendment to the appeal."
The organizations call attention to the importance of the decision at the request of counsel, in that the reiteration of the decision of the Supreme Court prevent autonomic managers and developers involved in the project (seeking the construction of 4,700 dwellings, hotel and Golf in the protected space LIC and Sierra de la Almenara SPA), can destroy the environmental assets in the area until there is final resolution of the case, they hope will be favorable to the arguments against development within the space protected.
ANSE and Ecologists in Action Regional regret that the Government has lagged that deserve Murcia on the subject.
Suffice it to recall that no public office involved in his resignation despite the seriousness of the events investigated and criminal charges for justice.
Moreover, the vast majority of the people involved are still in positions of responsibility under the Public Budget.
Suspension of urban redevelopment, in the view of lawyers ANSE and Ecologists in Action, a very important decision because it represents a change of doctrine by the Supreme Court of Murcia, which had hitherto been denied the suspension of planning changes urban to understand that they did not involve an alteration of the factual reality, forcing it to challenge other decisions as the instruments of urban development and building permits, which meant that many environmentally harmful projects and promoted by the Autonomous Community and Councils had just without judicial control.
Advocacy associations of nature and Ecologists in Action ANSE claim that in the case Zerrichera, and will void all administrative acts that allowed the re-planning, determine the true criminal responsibility and applies an exemplary punishment and public to prevent tolerance administrative and new attempts to circumvent environmental laws to benefit residential development at the expense of protected areas, which is why also submitted a complaint to the Prosecutor which ended with the opening of criminal proceedings.
The Association recalled that the Minister Benito Mercader not started the review process void or voidable acts to fulfill its public commitment to review the draft approved by them Zerrichera Ministry earlier and irresponsibly stopped the approval of the Plan Management of the SPA, in violation of the commitments to the European Union.
The then president of ANSE, Pedro Garcia, held in February 2006 a meeting with President of the Autonomous Community, Ramón Luis Valcárcel, in which he reported on irregularities in the handling of the reclassification of soils, but there Valcárcel given the slightest response to the thousands of signatures submitted so far against the estate.
For Associations, has been shown that the urbanization of the Natura 2000 network under the Zerrichera is an attack against the community's natural heritage.
Source: ANSE y Ecologistas en Accion
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies